Don't worry about explaining the basics--I've been trying to get 'literate' on VS lore. From the intro monologue, I'm aware of his Superioris gene traits.
His physique described as that of a 'greek god', the bust and his struggle to find his place in the order of things lead me to picture him, despite his melancholy, the military experience under his belt and his evident existential pessimism, in the 30s-40s range, maybe?
The monologue speaks of emotional scars--the visual cues for which are, naturally, physical scars (they scream "this guy has a past".) Decolored skin or subtle indentations are just as valid as the stereotypical overkill gashes with stitch marks. Another alternative is making the character the kind of guy who keeps to himself, but Deucalion obviously does not belong to this group.
It could be reasonably expected for his Klk'k upbringing to show in his demeanor, attire, or even as marks on his physiology.
I guess there's more room for one to fill the shoes of the protagonist if he's practically non-existent. There's also the influence of comics, movies and tv: the most successful characters you see (or play) are those you identify with, but that's not a hard thing to achive. The character only needs to expose its humanity (worries, hopes, fears) to achieve this, and to abstain from needless idiosyncrasies so you're still comfortable about roleplaying him/her.There is also something, perhaps, to be said for player character minimalism and letting the player do as much visualizing as possible about their own character
This is not to say that art styles have no influence in the result. Of the three previous fixers, for instance, the "Hauler Junkie" portrays more emotion and looks less 'invulnerable'; we're likely to perceive him to be more 'human' (at least until intellect intervenes.) The rendering of Deucalion's hellenic-deity-styled physique could be simplified or toned down so it's trivial, and his factions given just a hint of caricaturesque expressionism for his psyche to be exposed more emphatically.
Comments?