r12285 | pyramid3d | 2008-05-16 16:03:05 -0300 (Fri, 16 May 2008) | 2 lines
Changed paths:
D /trunk/data/textures/backgrounds/black_back.bmp
A /trunk/data/textures/backgrounds/black_back.image (from /trunk/data/textures/backgrounds/black_back.bmp:12284)
The svn command is svn move (mv, rename, ren). The help says it's the same a copy + delete. Which is what the log looks like, except the log has the delete first. So I'm wondering if that's the best subversion can do. Not very impressive, IMHO. Sure, it keeps the version history, but having to re-download the contents of renamed files is pretty lame.
I use darcs for my own small projects, and it's a distributed VC system where every copy of the repository has the complete history, so I'm no subversion expert. (darcs would be horrible for large projects, esp. with lots of big binary files.) But if there is a way to rename files in svn that avoids people having to re-download, you could maybe revert r12285 and re-do it that way... Not everyone will svn updated already...
BTW, VS is looking great since last time I played it (almost a year ago). I tend to get addicted to a game and play it all day every day for a while, then move on to something else after a while. e.g. my job. Anyway, it helps that I have a 7600GT and a 22" widescreen LCD to play it on, which does much better than my g965 or my NVidia 6200.
Now I wish the textures were bigger/higher rez. (the backgrounds look pixellated or blocky/banded at 1680x1050. Everything else is fine, though. And there's only ever one background texture per system, so you could afford to spend more texture memory on them.)
