safemode wrote:i had a bunch more to say but i think this thread has pretty much gotten no where. code talks, the rest is just mental mastubation. There is no "right" or "wrong" here, so in the end it comes down to, what the code is going to look like in either method. It's not going to be really apparent which method is better until the code is actually implemented.
I rather the thing being damaged control how the energy from the weapon is distributed, you want the weapon to have a say. That's the core of the argument.
Sorry, I don't see this last message and have put a long one just before. I was trying to say the same thing. Let's work towards an implementation.
