Cute
It's not what I was looking for for the Pavlov, but if you shrink each down by a factor of about 3, I think we can happily take them as-is for Andolian security drones (to be named later)
For the Pavlov, a few things:
0) It's a bomber and an interceptor, not a bomber and a fighter
1) The size you were ending up is pretty good, but see later comments below in section 3) for I versus B variants.
2) Visually, what I'd like to see is something that's clearly the exact same chassis, with a plausibly modular re-armament. To put it another way, it should look like one basic model that, if you took it into the shop, you could pop the interceptor rig off and replace it with the bomber rig. I was originally thinking along bilateral lines, but the three-way split sort of arrangement you have could work very well too, possibly even better - just make the central portion larger (the basic chassis) and then put all of the weapons on the 3 extensions. Actually, thinking ahead to the bomber variant - 1 medium mount on the central body, and all other weapons on the detachable pods.
3) The bomber variant needs a lot more ordinance. It's not going to be gun-centric at all. The whole idea of a bomber drone is range extension. Use lots of short ranged high yield/mass weapons mounted on a semi-expendable semi-autonomous deployment platform. None of the VS "Bombers" are bombers in the sense that they're (primarily) designed to drop drive-less ordinance (there will be _some_ driveless ordinance types), but the principle is still similar. As for the interceptor, it's going to be minimizing additional mass for superior accel and maneuver, and it's going to be designed for a hard-striking limited engagement, rather than a sustained control of an area (that's why its an interceptor, and not a superiority fighter). It's going to need to look a lot less massive than the bomber drone, but that should be easy to depict - because the bomber drone will have huge racks of ordinance it's carrying, whereas the interceptor will be packing only a sparse handful of missiles and an ammo-limited heavy gun.
4) Thrusters in more places. And Radiators.
Maneuvering thrusters between each of the weapon attachments would be nice - there's no person inside, so this thing should be very obviously built to spin like a top. The radiators are probably best attached to the weapon mounts.
) Likely destroying the drone in the process. Otherwise it would be beter, tactically and material efficient to make bombers manned.
