High-Born Luxury Yacht
Moderator: pyramid
-
- Minister of Information
- Posts: 1895
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 9:40 pm
- Location: The land of tenure (and diaper changes)
Downloaded the .wings model.
The pronounced viewing area has firmly solidified my opinion in the direction of a High-born Luxury Yacht.
For concept of scale, I envision the forward "glassbottom-style" viewing area (the blue region) to be ~9-10 meters wide - an opulent observation area, just large enough to hold a "small" cocktail party.
To add:
Retro thrusters on both the rear and foward "wings".
Additional attention to rearmost section between engines
Possibly an additional horizontal support at the top of the viewing area.
Additional details - sensors, transcievers, airlocks, etc to help define sense of scale.
Turn indented portion of lower hull into attachment area for a tightly coupled custom pinnace (~20m long). (the yacht will never see dirtside, nor, unless it's in dire need of maintenance, even the inside of any 'common' dock.)
Additional modeling:
-- Model pinnace.
Make a few (compatible) variants of the yacht and pinnace - for the ammount of money someone would be shelling out for one of these, they'd like to be able to choose between a few different models.
The pronounced viewing area has firmly solidified my opinion in the direction of a High-born Luxury Yacht.
For concept of scale, I envision the forward "glassbottom-style" viewing area (the blue region) to be ~9-10 meters wide - an opulent observation area, just large enough to hold a "small" cocktail party.
To add:
Retro thrusters on both the rear and foward "wings".
Additional attention to rearmost section between engines
Possibly an additional horizontal support at the top of the viewing area.
Additional details - sensors, transcievers, airlocks, etc to help define sense of scale.
Turn indented portion of lower hull into attachment area for a tightly coupled custom pinnace (~20m long). (the yacht will never see dirtside, nor, unless it's in dire need of maintenance, even the inside of any 'common' dock.)
Additional modeling:
-- Model pinnace.
Make a few (compatible) variants of the yacht and pinnace - for the ammount of money someone would be shelling out for one of these, they'd like to be able to choose between a few different models.
-
- Bounty Hunter
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:35 pm
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
Awesome! Luxury yacht it is! With 50 meters long engines it will be a nice compliment for rich people with lacking self-esteem
I'll try to come up with a few more (3 total?) designs. I have one idea of a variant with more glass areas, meant to be gardens/pool/sports areas. Does transparent textures render correct in VS?
Other ideas are welcome.
With the current scale the ship will be about 180 meters long (based on that the glass 10 m wide). The dostoevsky in the picture below is roughly 30 meters long (for reference, how long is a dostoevsky/normal small ship in VS?). IMO this would be the ideal pinnace/yacht scale ratio.
What company manufactures these crafts? I think adding a logo/modell no/company name somewhere in the texture would be nice detail.
If anyone knows where to find information regarding adding getting this ingame and how to do the engine-glow I'd appreciate some pointers. I looked in the wiki but didn't find anything, old forum threads?
I'll add this to the list in the wiki.
EDIT:
Here's a pic of the retro thrusters:
It weighs in at 3300 triangles
I'll try to come up with a few more (3 total?) designs. I have one idea of a variant with more glass areas, meant to be gardens/pool/sports areas. Does transparent textures render correct in VS?
Other ideas are welcome.
With the current scale the ship will be about 180 meters long (based on that the glass 10 m wide). The dostoevsky in the picture below is roughly 30 meters long (for reference, how long is a dostoevsky/normal small ship in VS?). IMO this would be the ideal pinnace/yacht scale ratio.
What company manufactures these crafts? I think adding a logo/modell no/company name somewhere in the texture would be nice detail.
If anyone knows where to find information regarding adding getting this ingame and how to do the engine-glow I'd appreciate some pointers. I looked in the wiki but didn't find anything, old forum threads?
I'll add this to the list in the wiki.
EDIT:
Here's a pic of the retro thrusters:
It weighs in at 3300 triangles
-
- Elite
- Posts: 1671
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 12:46 am
- Location: Earth, Sol system.
- Contact:
-
- Elite
- Posts: 7243
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:40 pm
- Location: LS87, Buenos Aires, República Argentina
-
- Bounty Hunter
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:35 pm
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
@hurleybird: yes it will have windows, the good kind
@klauss: it's a good idea but I think it might be hard to pull off. anything I put in there will look rather small since it's supposed to be 10 m wide. I had a thought not like yours when thinking of the gardens i mentioned - that IMO could look really beneath a transparent texture, which brings me back to "does VS do them okay?".
@jackS: should the yacht have any arms or does it rely on escort craft / fleeing (nice to have those big engines ) to protect it from pirates?
@klauss: it's a good idea but I think it might be hard to pull off. anything I put in there will look rather small since it's supposed to be 10 m wide. I had a thought not like yours when thinking of the gardens i mentioned - that IMO could look really beneath a transparent texture, which brings me back to "does VS do them okay?".
@jackS: should the yacht have any arms or does it rely on escort craft / fleeing (nice to have those big engines ) to protect it from pirates?
-
- Fearless Venturer
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 6:42 pm
- Location: Northern Illinois
My two cents: Good ECM and HEAVY shields, maybe point defence for what ECM doesn't stop. Perhaps a small (1-4) contingent of fighters.
I've stopped playing. I'm waiting for a new release.
I've kicked the MMO habit for now, but if I maintain enough money for an EVE-Online subscription, I'll be gone again.
I've kicked the MMO habit for now, but if I maintain enough money for an EVE-Online subscription, I'll be gone again.
-
- Elite
- Posts: 1832
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 10:21 pm
- Location: State of Denial
- Contact:
tiny_paintings: I wrote a short article on adding engine glow via units.csv, it's in the wiki HowTos section (Engine glow is added after-the-fact, it's not a component of the ship model). Also, look in that section for documentation on how to get models into the game. If you can't find one, please tell me and I'll write one.
You don't have to worry about the nitty gritty if you don't want to- send the finished model my way (along with textures and a specularity map if you can make one) and I will get it into the game for you. Of course, it's a good skill to be able to get your own ships into the game, so if you still want to learn how, I'll help you.
You don't have to worry about the nitty gritty if you don't want to- send the finished model my way (along with textures and a specularity map if you can make one) and I will get it into the game for you. Of course, it's a good skill to be able to get your own ships into the game, so if you still want to learn how, I'll help you.
-
- Elite
- Posts: 1671
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 12:46 am
- Location: Earth, Sol system.
- Contact:
-
- Bounty Hunter
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:35 pm
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
I said I'd add this to the wiki list didn't I? Well, no can do as I cannot log in - it says I should use my forum username & password but that doesn't work so well. Maybe someone else can add it, or tell me what I'm doing wrong.
Yeah, ECM and nice, expensive shields are probably enough for most people.
Of course, if _when_ I buy one I will be sure to mount one or two of these puppies
Would be great for scale perception but cost lots of polies.
@halleck: Thanks! Seems easy enough. There is no "how to put your unit ingame" per se, but there seems to be scattered information enough. I'll get back to you if I have questions.
@hurleybird: Good thinking! Why didn't I think of that?
Yeah, ECM and nice, expensive shields are probably enough for most people.
Of course, if _when_ I buy one I will be sure to mount one or two of these puppies
Would be great for scale perception but cost lots of polies.
@halleck: Thanks! Seems easy enough. There is no "how to put your unit ingame" per se, but there seems to be scattered information enough. I'll get back to you if I have questions.
@hurleybird: Good thinking! Why didn't I think of that?
-
- Elite
- Posts: 1671
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 12:46 am
- Location: Earth, Sol system.
- Contact:
-
- Minister of Information
- Posts: 1895
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 9:40 pm
- Location: The land of tenure (and diaper changes)
Windows are wunderbar.
I'd leave weapons emplacements off of all but 1 variant, and make that 1 variant clearly the "Most beloved possession of a petty dictator of an insignificant moon"-style variant. Most customers wouldn't be sailing their yachts through pirate infested regions, and if they did, they'd arrange for protection that did not involve besmirching their paint-job. To survive the unexpected encounter, there are the tried and true methods of payoffs, and of running screaming for the authorities, hoping that one's shields hold out
A Dostoevsky (at least in current CVS, I tweaked the ship sizes a bit a week or so ago) is ~26 meters long. Thinking some more, I was thinking that the pinnace should probably be a fair bit bigger than the 20 m I first suggested, as it would likely be designed to seat several guests (with luggage) and the chauffer. I was thinking of making it nestle into the curve behind the forward underslung region, rather than attaching it at the back - at the least, it would probably be a bit forward of the dostoevsky in the picture so as not to cause the passengers to have to disembark near the mechanic's and servants' quarters
Transparent textures - I believe the interior would need to be a distinct mesh with the current engine setup, but otherwise are great
I'd leave weapons emplacements off of all but 1 variant, and make that 1 variant clearly the "Most beloved possession of a petty dictator of an insignificant moon"-style variant. Most customers wouldn't be sailing their yachts through pirate infested regions, and if they did, they'd arrange for protection that did not involve besmirching their paint-job. To survive the unexpected encounter, there are the tried and true methods of payoffs, and of running screaming for the authorities, hoping that one's shields hold out
A Dostoevsky (at least in current CVS, I tweaked the ship sizes a bit a week or so ago) is ~26 meters long. Thinking some more, I was thinking that the pinnace should probably be a fair bit bigger than the 20 m I first suggested, as it would likely be designed to seat several guests (with luggage) and the chauffer. I was thinking of making it nestle into the curve behind the forward underslung region, rather than attaching it at the back - at the least, it would probably be a bit forward of the dostoevsky in the picture so as not to cause the passengers to have to disembark near the mechanic's and servants' quarters
Transparent textures - I believe the interior would need to be a distinct mesh with the current engine setup, but otherwise are great
-
- Elite
- Posts: 1832
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 10:21 pm
- Location: State of Denial
- Contact:
-
- Elite
- Posts: 8014
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 4:03 am
- Location: Montreal
- Contact:
Great job with the retro thrusters! The whole ship looks 7 times better and more interesting with them. As for windows, IMO, there should be two rows on each side above the wings, and one more row in the front bulge under the wings, if my math is right.
Latest version of Cinemut Opaque
Latest version of LaGrande noodleworks (scroll down).
An evolving La Grande How-To...
The non-working, but latest, CineMut test_bike
PU (Privateer: Parallel Universe's Home). WC or Privateer Drayman for you?
WCpedia --The Wing Commander Encyclopedia-- From Angel Deveraux through Belisarius to Zachary Banfeld...
WC Nexus forum, the Moonbase Tycho of WC fans.
Latest version of LaGrande noodleworks (scroll down).
An evolving La Grande How-To...
The non-working, but latest, CineMut test_bike
PU (Privateer: Parallel Universe's Home). WC or Privateer Drayman for you?
WCpedia --The Wing Commander Encyclopedia-- From Angel Deveraux through Belisarius to Zachary Banfeld...
WC Nexus forum, the Moonbase Tycho of WC fans.
-
- Elite
- Posts: 1832
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 10:21 pm
- Location: State of Denial
- Contact:
I decided to make good on my promise. Here's HowTo:Add Ships.Halleck wrote:Also, look in that section for documentation on how to get models into the game. If you can't find one, please tell me and I'll write one.
Hope this comes in handy as a general reference! (Also, can some folks help with cleaning it up a bit? Thanks.)
-
- Bounty Hunter
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:35 pm
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
Great initiative halleck
I just skimmed through it and most things of interest seems to be there. I have one request (anybody feel free to contribute ) though - some more information about LODs. More specifically what to name them, and what I have to do in order to get them working - is it just a matter of naming them right?
Here's a candidate for the armed variant:
I cheated a bit and subdivided and rendered it make it better looking
It's basically the yacht as you've seen it before with a commanding bridge and modified front wings. They are now shorter and more distinct, and also not really wings anymore but thrusters. The cocktail lounge is still in place for "small" classy events but now the petty-little-dictator-over-an-insignifficant-moon also has his own bridge where he can make himself look important.
c&c please!
I just skimmed through it and most things of interest seems to be there. I have one request (anybody feel free to contribute ) though - some more information about LODs. More specifically what to name them, and what I have to do in order to get them working - is it just a matter of naming them right?
Here's a candidate for the armed variant:
I cheated a bit and subdivided and rendered it make it better looking
It's basically the yacht as you've seen it before with a commanding bridge and modified front wings. They are now shorter and more distinct, and also not really wings anymore but thrusters. The cocktail lounge is still in place for "small" classy events but now the petty-little-dictator-over-an-insignifficant-moon also has his own bridge where he can make himself look important.
c&c please!
-
- Elite
- Posts: 7243
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:40 pm
- Location: LS87, Buenos Aires, República Argentina
Transparent textures: theorically, as long as they're always fully-opaque or fully-transparent, it should work. In practice, the engine doesn't enable alpha blending for normal meshes, so it's a no. BUT, you can have mesh parts which are transparent. Just not the entire mesh (or better said, it could be the entire mesh but it wouldn't be good for performance). Basically, do this: draw the entire thing opaque, without the transparent things, as one object. Then, have separate meshes for the transparent items. When you convert to XMESH, you have to assign a blend mode of "SRCALPHA INVSRCALPHA" to the transparent meshes, and the usual "ONE ZERO" to opaque ones. Transparent meshes are sorted and drawn in a specific sequence relative to opaque meshes so that they render correctly. That's why you shouldn't make the entire thing use transparency: it would hinder performance by treating the entire thing as order-dependant.
At some point we will add an "ALPHATEST" option so that you may use transparent meshes which are fully opaque or fully transparent without requiring order dependency (so you can use them as you wish). But that's not done for now.
At some point we will add an "ALPHATEST" option so that you may use transparent meshes which are fully opaque or fully transparent without requiring order dependency (so you can use them as you wish). But that's not done for now.
-
- Elite
- Posts: 1832
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 10:21 pm
- Location: State of Denial
- Contact:
-
- Elite
- Posts: 7243
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:40 pm
- Location: LS87, Buenos Aires, República Argentina
LODs can be named whatever you like. Find a model with LODs in game (most Rlaan ships) and convert them to BFXM. You'll see a lot of 0_1, 0_2, 0_3 files which are the lods, (n_l with n=number of mesh, l=LOD level), but that naming scheme is arbitrary since BFXM does not have names for them. When you write your own files, you can do whatever you like. You just need to convert all to xmesh, and add the LOD entries to the xmesh, and perform the "mesher .xmesh .bfxm xbc" step. I'm not sure, but I think it reads the LOD levels declared in the mesh automatically. If you had multiple meshes to add, each with its own LOD sequence, you repeat the process with "xba" instead of "xbc".
-
- Elite Mercenary
- Posts: 1329
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 11:51 pm
- Location: Manchester, UK
- Contact:
-
- Privateer
- Posts: 729
- Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2003 8:32 am
-
- Bounty Hunter
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:35 pm
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
@Halleck:
Look at that sweet puppy! 60 admonishers you say? No problem, sir!
Development of the yacht and the pinnaces sort of came to an halt due to lack of inspiration... things will come when I come up with a good enough design.
In the meanwhile I've been trying to learn how to UV, texture and LOD things... The result is what you see above - the textures aren't serious attempts, merely excerices (made it in like 5 minutes... uh... not really ) to view my sweet turret ingame
Also, what's up with specularity? I've got almost black specmaps (for the ship it is) but they still shine like hell. What material properties from wings get exported? Do both material spec. and the spec map apply?
EDIT: Here's a better up-close picture:
Look at that sweet puppy! 60 admonishers you say? No problem, sir!
Development of the yacht and the pinnaces sort of came to an halt due to lack of inspiration... things will come when I come up with a good enough design.
In the meanwhile I've been trying to learn how to UV, texture and LOD things... The result is what you see above - the textures aren't serious attempts, merely excerices (made it in like 5 minutes... uh... not really ) to view my sweet turret ingame
Also, what's up with specularity? I've got almost black specmaps (for the ship it is) but they still shine like hell. What material properties from wings get exported? Do both material spec. and the spec map apply?
EDIT: Here's a better up-close picture:
Last edited by tiny paintings on Thu Jul 07, 2005 10:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Elite
- Posts: 7243
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:40 pm
- Location: LS87, Buenos Aires, República Argentina
A few tips on specular maps:
Better way to handle them, is to convert to xmesh and edit by hand.
There, you have:
texture="" (diffuse)
texture1="" (specmap/PPL)
texture2="" (damagemap)
texture3="" (glowmap)
Also, material has some attributes:
reflect="0/1" most noticeably
Now, diffuse is applied as the base.
If reflect="1", specmap modulates the environment mapped reflection, and specularity is applied at full strength in the back material (depending on VS config). Thus, if you have reflect="1" and don't want specularity, set
<specular red="0" green="0" blue="0" alpha="0"/>
in the material. (Unless you enable "specmap_with_reflection" in vegastrike.config, cvs version, that will make specmap modulate both: envmap and specular, and looks neat - try it: in graphics, <var name="specmap_with_reflection" value="true"/>).
If reflect="0", the specmap will act as you expect, and no specularity will be visible on a black-specmap surface.
Better way to handle them, is to convert to xmesh and edit by hand.
There, you have:
texture="" (diffuse)
texture1="" (specmap/PPL)
texture2="" (damagemap)
texture3="" (glowmap)
Also, material has some attributes:
reflect="0/1" most noticeably
Now, diffuse is applied as the base.
If reflect="1", specmap modulates the environment mapped reflection, and specularity is applied at full strength in the back material (depending on VS config). Thus, if you have reflect="1" and don't want specularity, set
<specular red="0" green="0" blue="0" alpha="0"/>
in the material. (Unless you enable "specmap_with_reflection" in vegastrike.config, cvs version, that will make specmap modulate both: envmap and specular, and looks neat - try it: in graphics, <var name="specmap_with_reflection" value="true"/>).
If reflect="0", the specmap will act as you expect, and no specularity will be visible on a black-specmap surface.
-
- Bounty Hunter
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:35 pm
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
Clarifies things a bit. I already had the specmaps in the xmeshes, but not the material spec. set to zero.
One more thing: it looks good for me now, but won't it look crap on non-PPL capable cards? I would want the material spec. to be active on those cards - or does VS handle this for me already? I hope it does.
One more thing: it looks good for me now, but won't it look crap on non-PPL capable cards? I would want the material spec. to be active on those cards - or does VS handle this for me already? I hope it does.
-
- Elite
- Posts: 7243
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:40 pm
- Location: LS87, Buenos Aires, República Argentina
No, it doesn't.
You can't have it working well on both without the "specmap_with_reflection" extension, which is one of the reasons I added that extension in the first place.
One workaround, is to disable reflections if you like the specmap better.
If you have reflection, the specmap modulates that and NOT the specularity. So, if you don't want specularity, you have to turn it off. Now, if you just want specularity at some points, you need PPL. But you can't have both reflection and PPL specularity, so it's quite a pickle. To add to the mix, if you set the specularity color to black, you won't have specularity even if the user selects PPL without reflection.
For what you say, it seems you want "specmap_with_reflection": you want reflection, but also a specmap. Perhaps "specmap_with_reflection=true" should be the default. It's a little slower, but it's not very noticeable. I didn't make it the default since I wanted to keep it unobstrusive. I guess it depends on what hellcatv feels on that matter.
You can't have it working well on both without the "specmap_with_reflection" extension, which is one of the reasons I added that extension in the first place.
One workaround, is to disable reflections if you like the specmap better.
If you have reflection, the specmap modulates that and NOT the specularity. So, if you don't want specularity, you have to turn it off. Now, if you just want specularity at some points, you need PPL. But you can't have both reflection and PPL specularity, so it's quite a pickle. To add to the mix, if you set the specularity color to black, you won't have specularity even if the user selects PPL without reflection.
For what you say, it seems you want "specmap_with_reflection": you want reflection, but also a specmap. Perhaps "specmap_with_reflection=true" should be the default. It's a little slower, but it's not very noticeable. I didn't make it the default since I wanted to keep it unobstrusive. I guess it depends on what hellcatv feels on that matter.
-
- Elite
- Posts: 1671
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 12:46 am
- Location: Earth, Sol system.
- Contact:
I just want to say 'that's an awesome perspective on the first screenshot'
If only it was fully textured with some AA
If only it was fully textured with some AA
Last edited by hurleybird on Fri Jul 08, 2005 7:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.