Page 1 of 1
Akyazi anyone?
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:34 pm
by Adonis
Here's my Akyazi so far. If you guys want her when finished just tell.
Adonis
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:44 pm
by tillias
Damn, sure!
Mailed you. Post here weapons info. E.g. how many phasers banks, how many torpedoe tubes and their locations.
Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 12:41 am
by Adonis
Slight update:
Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 2:17 pm
by Adonis
The lady got her teeth 
Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 5:53 pm
by Adonis
Ok, mesh is finished, here's some pix for ya'll
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 2:38 am
by Halleck
Cool!
Planning on texturing it?
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 4:23 pm
by Adonis
Halleck wrote:Cool!
Planning on texturing it?
Yup, that's next 
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:54 pm
by Adonis
Update:
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 8:11 am
by tillias
Adonis wrote:Update:
Very impressive! Any short speculations about this ship? Combat role? Comparsion to other classes/races?
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 2:38 pm
by Adonis
Akyazi class are small perimeter action ships.
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:59 am
by Adonis
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:05 am
by Adonis
Akula variant so far:
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 12:44 pm
by tillias
Adonis wrote:Akula variant so far:
Wow!
I suppose this class is small torpedo carrier specially designed for fast and sudden strikes. It have flaweless impulse speed, perfect manueverness and something about 4-6 torpedo tubes.
Armor and hull are pretty weak, shields are thin ( but with extremely fast recharge ability ). But... this ship wasn't designed for face-to-face battles :)
It was designed as fast interceptor. It's combat role is to intercept self-invited guest on maximum speed near Federation Space Border or Neutral Zone, slow down it's moving into Federation territory. While combat it basically roll on pretty big distance from enemy, launch all torpedoes time after time and wait while other more heavy-armed interceptors will help in battle.
Beam weapons are weak. Torpedoes are standart Federation Photons. But Akula have so much tubes, that even huge ships won't dodge all of them and can be heavily injured.
Am I right about this ship?
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:16 pm
by Gosshawk
Looks like two foward tubes, one aft. 6 phaser banks on the bottom and 8 on top. Late 23rd century?
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:47 pm
by tillias
Gosshawk wrote:Looks like two foward tubes, one aft. 6 phaser banks on the bottom and 8 on top. Late 23rd century?
Oops! This is my mistake, sorry ;-)
Completely forgoten about era. Just dreamed on DS9 era border interceptor
like this :-D
Without any doubt we will prepare it according to
this information
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:57 pm
by Gosshawk
Dont worry a bout it, I dont know either, only addonis would. I can just make guesses. But the lack of a rail phaser system gives an indication of the era. Also the necells.
Going whith those specs would be best of course.
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 1:36 pm
by Adonis
Gosshawk wrote:Looks like two foward tubes, one aft. 6 phaser banks on the bottom and 8 on top. Late 23rd century?
That's right. I set it up in Bridge Commander for each tube to fire two torps in a row with a 1.5 second delay between them and 30 second reload time, tho I'm thinking of changing that to 40 secs...I also made a variant which has 2 aft vetral phasers too (which infact are on the schematics but I kinda "forgot" to add them on the initial model lol). The Arbiter variant has two aft torp tubes.
Akyazi, Akula and other variants of her are perimeter action ships.
And Goshawk, it ain't called phaser rails as you put it, it's called phaser strips.
